Difference between revisions of "User talk:Stalegum"

From BaseballCardPedia.com
Jump to: navigation, search
(Thoughts on the long pages)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG
 
Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG
 +
Done. -CT
  
 
=Thoughts on the long pages=
 
=Thoughts on the long pages=

Revision as of 15:32, 4 February 2010

>Thanks for cleaning up the '07 Goudey article.

No problem. Now there's two articles on 2009 Unique. We should delete one, which one? -Chris

Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG Done. -CT

Thoughts on the long pages

My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what I was doing for 2006 Bowman Heritage. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like 1949 Bowman - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? Big Mamou 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

For most of the longer, game-used-intensive, sets, this would be the way to go. But for most sets (like Topps and Upper Deck's flagships) everything on one page would suffice. --Stalegum 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)